With yesterday’s proposal for a regulation on foreign subsidies, the European Commission seeks to address foreign subsidies which risk distorting the EU internal market and undermine a level playing field. The American Chamber of Commerce to the EU (AmCham EU) supports the Commission’s efforts to strengthen the resilience and competitiveness of the Single Market and find the appropriate balance between fair competition and open trade when addressing non-EU subsidies.
Statement on EU foreign subsidies proposal
With yesterday’s proposal for a regulation on foreign subsidies, the European Commission seeks to address foreign subsidies which risk distorting the EU internal market and undermine a level playing field. The American Chamber of Commerce to the EU (AmCham EU) supports the Commission’s efforts to strengthen the resilience and competitiveness of the Single Market and find the appropriate balance between fair competition and open trade when addressing non-EU subsidies.

However, AmCham EU cautions against an overly broad application that may be disproportionate to the Commission’s goals. To promote growth, investment and trade, the rulebook should be balanced and proportionate. The new toolkit should be used to address the distortive effect of subsidies available in non-market economies with well-funded state-owned enterprises and little oversight of state aid. The proposed mechanisms, as currently drafted, may impose significant additional compliance efforts on companies who already act transparently, while still not gathering necessary information and adequately targeting genuinely distortive practices.
Ultimately, unintentional targeting of international companies whose home jurisdiction share the EU’s open market principles risks to undermine foreign investment in the EU economy currently in need of a fast and sustainable recovery post-COVID-19. For example, requiring prior notification of foreign subsidies received up to three years prior to notification will create additional burdens on non-EU companies and could hamper legitimate foreign investment in Europe.
AmCham EU is pleased that some initial concerns with the White Paper appear to have been addressed, for instance the addition of relevant thresholds to ex-ante tools are welcome. These offer clarity with regard to the applicability of measures to mergers, acquisitions and procurement processes. Further dialogue is necessary to refine this new proposal which offers an opportunity to develop appropriate solutions to distortive market practices and to building a strong Single Market fit for a sustainable and digital age. AmCham EU calls on the Commission, Council and Parliament to address genuine distortions in a targeted and proportionate manner, whilst avoiding negative consequences for jobs, trade and investment. To achieve these goals alignment with international partners will be critical. AmCham EU looks forward to our continued engagement with the EU institutions and the Member States.
For more information, please read our response to the Commission’s White Paper on foreign subsidies.
Related items
:focal())
Engaging with the Cabinet of EVP Ribera on Europe’s economic agenda
On Tuesday, 25 November, AmCham EU hosted Miguel Gil Tertre, Head of Cabinet and Thomas Woolfson, Member of Cabinet to Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera, for an exchange with our Board on Europe’s economic agenda. The discussion explored priorities for strengthening Europe’s competitiveness, ensuring a well-functioning Single Market and advancing effective transaction screening. With US companies closely integrated into the EU economy, a shared commitment to boosting investment and innovation remains essential.
:focal())
42nd Annual Competition Policy Conference: in review
This year’s Annual Competition Policy Conference, Cutting through the noise to shape effective competition policy, took place on Thursday, 17 October. The event examined how competition policy can contribute to economic resilience and strategic influence amidst growing global uncertainty. Maggy Peeters, Director of Communications and Outreach, and Angélique de Brousse (Johnson & Johnson), Chair, Competition Policy Committee, AmCham EU opened the conference by underscoring the role of competition policy in shaping Europe’s industrial and geopolitical future.
The first panel explored how geopolitical developments are influencing industrial strategies and the evolving role of competition tools. Astrid Cousin, Head of Unit, Commission Priorities and Strategic Coordination, Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission, discussed how competition policy is adapting to meet the EU’s broader strategic and industrial objectives. Miriam Lexmann, MEP (EPP, SK) emphasised the need for measured policy tools rooted in both security and shared democratic values. Representing the technology sector, Alexandre Roure, Head of Policy, Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), highlighted the importance of fair, transparent and predictable policy frameworks for competitiveness and growth. With the guidance of Zach Meyers, Research Director, Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE), the discussion addressed the future of competition policy.
Following a coffee break, the audience heard a fireside chat between Natalie Harsdorf, Director-General, Federal Austrian Competition Authority and Martijn Snoep, Chairman, Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets. The discussions looked at Austria and The Netherlands’ approaches to anti-competitive subthreshold transactions and reflected on how regulators are adapting their approaches to meet emerging industrial challenges while retaining certainty for investors. Moderated by Nicholas Hirst, Chief Correspondent, EU Competition, MLex, the conversation explored the interplay between certainty and adaptability in merger control.
Offering an industry perspective, Sharon Marshall, Director, Europe, the Middle East and Africa Partnerships, Google, stressed that effective competition policy should drive innovation and facilitate collaborative partnerships. The conversation, moderated by Thibaut L'Ortye, Senior Director of Public Affairs, AmCham EU, highlighted the significant influence competition rules have on shaping markets.
The final panel focused on reinforcing EU-US cooperation in competition enforcement. Inge Bernaerts, Director, Policy and Strategy, Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission, emphasised the continued importance of collaboration around shared visions and values between regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. Kevin Buckley, Vice-President, Global Government Affairs, Johnson & Johnson, highlighted the private sector’s need for predictability and standards to support innovation. Philip Lowe, Senior Advisor, Kekst CNC, reflected on mutual lessons to be drawn from the European and US approaches to enforcement, including the value of the Single Market as a driver of growth and prosperity. Moderated by Natalie McNelis, Bureau Chief, Mergermarket/PaRR, the panel reaffirmed the continued importance of transatlantic alignment and the Single Market to foster economic resilience and competitiveness.
Thank you to everyone who attended, as well as our Premium sponsor Google and our Media Partner MLex.

41st Annual Competition Policy Conference: Balancing rules-based competition policy and economic security
This year’s Annual Competition Policy Conference ‘Competition policy and economic security’, took place on Thursday, 14 November. The conference focused on how to balance a rules-based approach to competition policy with a more geopolitically-driven model. Malte Lohan, CEO and Elsa Sependa (AT&T), Chair, Competition Policy Committee, AmCham EU kicked off the event by underling the need for effective and fair competition rules to ensure that Europe remains attractive and competitive on the global stage. During the event, we heard from Damien Gérard, Prosecutor General, Belgian Competition Authority who presented the Belgian Competition Authority’s approach of using competition policy to speed up the development of digital infrastructure.
The first panel was an examination of how geopolitical trends shape regulation. Our panelists explored the numerous geoeconomic challenges facing the EU and how competition policy can be employed alongside other policy tools to address these challenges. During the panel we heard from Maria Demertzis, Director, Economic Strategy and Finance Program, The Conference Board Europe; Aura Salla, MEP (EPP, FI); Koen Van de Casteele, Director, State aid: General Scrutiny and Enforcement, Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission and Astri Van Dyke, Director, Global Competition Policy, Google. Ioannis Lianos, Professor, Competition Law and Policy, University College London moderated the discussion while also setting the scene by giving a historical view of competition policy developments from around the world.
The second panel of the day looked at economic security, where our speakers considered the role national security plays in transaction screening. Moderated by Natalie McNelis, Senior Correspondent, MLex, the panel discussed the complexities around merger control rules and how a coordinated approach between Member States will make it easier for investment to make its way into the EU. Attendees heard from Ief Daems, Legal Director of Antitrust, Cisco; Chair, In-House Competition Lawyers Association (ICLA); Steffen Hindelang, Director and Co-Founder, CELIS Institute and Professor, International Investment and Trade Law, Uppsala University; Francesco Macchiaroli, General Counsel, Avio Aero and Aiste Slezeviciute, incoming Head of Sector, Foreign Direct Investment Screening, Directorate-General for Trade, European Commission
Thank you to Elsa Sependa (AT&T) Chair, Competition Policy Committee, AmCham EU for moderating the event, as well as our sponsor Baker Botts and our media partner MLex.
Policy priorities
Insights and advocacy driving Europe’s policy agenda. Our priorities support growth, innovation and a stronger transatlantic economy.
Membership
Connecting business and policymakers to strengthen the voice of American companies in Europe.